Quantum-PEFT: Ultra parameter-efficient fine-tuning

Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Francesco Tonin, Yongtao Wu, Frank Zhengqing Wu, Leyla Naz Candogan +1 more
3/7/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

This paper introduces Quantum-PEFT that leverages quantum computations for parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). Unlike other additive PEFT methods, such as low-rank adaptation (LoRA), Quantum-PEFT exploits an underlying full-rank yet surprisingly parameter efficient quantum unitary parameterization. With the use of Pauli parameterization, the number of trainable parameters grows only logarithmically with the ambient dimension, as opposed to linearly as in LoRA-based PEFT methods. Quantum-PEFT achieves vanishingly smaller number of trainable parameters than the lowest-rank LoRA as dimensions grow, enhancing parameter efficiency while maintaining a competitive performance. We apply Quantum-PEFT to several transfer learning benchmarks in language and vision, demonstrating significant advantages in parameter efficiency.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{koikeakino2025quantumpeft,
  title  = {Quantum-PEFT: Ultra parameter-efficient fine-tuning},
  author = {Toshiaki Koike-Akino and Francesco Tonin and Yongtao Wu and Frank Zhengqing Wu and Leyla Naz Candogan and Volkan Cevher},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.05431},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05431v1},
  journal = {ICLR 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.05431.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.05431)

Discussion