Graph-Dependent Regret Bounds in Multi-Armed Bandits with Interference

Fateme Jamshidi, Mohammad Shahverdikondori, Negar Kiyavash
3/10/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study multi-armed bandits under network interference, where each unit's reward depends on its own treatment and those of its neighbors in a given graph. This induces an exponentially large action space, making standard approaches computationally impractical. We propose a novel algorithm that uses the local graph structure to minimize regret. We derive a graph-dependent upper bound on cumulative regret that improves over prior work. Additionally, we provide the first lower bounds for bandits with arbitrary network interference, where each bound involves a distinct structural property of the graph. These bounds show that for both dense and sparse graphs, our algorithm is nearly optimal, with matching upper and lower bounds up to logarithmic factors. When the interference graph is unknown, a variant of our algorithm is Pareto optimal: no algorithm can uniformly outperform it across all instances. We complement our theoretical results with numerical experiments, showing that our approach outperforms the baseline methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jamshidi2025graphdependent,
  title  = {Graph-Dependent Regret Bounds in Multi-Armed Bandits with Interference},
  author = {Fateme Jamshidi and Mohammad Shahverdikondori and Negar Kiyavash},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.07555},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07555v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.07555.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.07555)

Discussion