MinorBench: A hand-built benchmark for content-based risks for children

Shaun Khoo, Gabriel Chua, Rachel Shong
3/13/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly entering children's lives - through parent-driven adoption, schools, and peer networks - yet current AI ethics and safety research do not adequately address content-related risks specific to minors. In this paper, we highlight these gaps with a real-world case study of an LLM-based chatbot deployed in a middle school setting, revealing how students used and sometimes misused the system. Building on these findings, we propose a new taxonomy of content-based risks for minors and introduce MinorBench, an open-source benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on their ability to refuse unsafe or inappropriate queries from children. We evaluate six prominent LLMs under different system prompts, demonstrating substantial variability in their child-safety compliance. Our results inform practical steps for more robust, child-focused safety mechanisms and underscore the urgency of tailoring AI systems to safeguard young users.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{khoo2025minorbench,
  title  = {MinorBench: A hand-built benchmark for content-based risks for children},
  author = {Shaun Khoo and Gabriel Chua and Rachel Shong},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.10242},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10242v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.10242.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.10242)

Discussion