Revisiting Gradient Descent: A Dual-Weight Method for Improved Learning

Xi Wang
3/15/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce a novel framework for learning in neural networks by decomposing each neuron's weight vector into two distinct parts, $W_1$ and $W_2$, thereby modeling contrastive information directly at the neuron level. Traditional gradient descent stores both positive (target) and negative (non-target) feature information in a single weight vector, often obscuring fine-grained distinctions. Our approach, by contrast, maintains separate updates for target and non-target features, ultimately forming a single effective weight $W = W_1 - W_2$ that is more robust to noise and class imbalance. Experimental results on both regression (California Housing, Wine Quality) and classification (MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10) tasks suggest that this decomposition enhances generalization and resists overfitting, especially when training data are sparse or noisy. Crucially, the inference complexity remains the same as in the standard $WX + \text{bias}$ setup, offering a practical solution for improved learning without additional inference-time overhead.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2025revisiting,
  title  = {Revisiting Gradient Descent: A Dual-Weight Method for Improved Learning},
  author = {Xi Wang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.11965},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11965v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.11965.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.11965)

Discussion