More Women, Same Stereotypes: Unpacking the Gender Bias Paradox in Large Language Models

Evan Chen, Run-Jun Zhan, Yan-Bai Lin, Hung-Hsuan Chen
3/20/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet concerns persist regarding their tendency to reflect or amplify social biases. This study introduces a novel evaluation framework to uncover gender biases in LLMs: using free-form storytelling to surface biases embedded within the models. A systematic analysis of ten prominent LLMs shows a consistent pattern of overrepresenting female characters across occupations, likely due to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Paradoxically, despite this overrepresentation, the occupational gender distributions produced by these LLMs align more closely with human stereotypes than with real-world labor data. This highlights the challenge and importance of implementing balanced mitigation measures to promote fairness and prevent the establishment of potentially new biases. We release the prompts and LLM-generated stories at GitHub.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2025more,
  title  = {More Women, Same Stereotypes: Unpacking the Gender Bias Paradox in Large Language Models},
  author = {Evan Chen and Run-Jun Zhan and Yan-Bai Lin and Hung-Hsuan Chen},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.15904},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15904v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.15904.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.15904)

Discussion