How Effective Is Constitutional AI in Small LLMs? A Study on DeepSeek-R1 and Its Peers

Antonio-Gabriel Chacón Menke, Phan Xuan Tan
2/1/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recent incidents highlight safety risks in Large Language Models (LLMs), motivating research into alignment methods like Constitutional AI (CAI). This paper explores CAI's self-critique mechanism on small, uncensored 7-9B parameter models: DeepSeek-R1-8B, Gemma-2-9B, Llama 3.1-8B, and Qwen2.5-7B. We show that while Llama-based models exhibited significant harm reduction through self-critique, other architectures demonstrated less improvement in harm detection after abliteration. These results suggest CAI's effectiveness may vary depending on model architecture and reasoning capabilities.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{menke2025effective,
  title  = {How Effective Is Constitutional AI in Small LLMs? A Study on DeepSeek-R1 and Its Peers},
  author = {Antonio-Gabriel Chacón Menke and Phan Xuan Tan},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.17365},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17365v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.17365.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.17365)

Discussion