Can Large Language Models Predict Associations Among Human Attitudes?

Ana Ma, Derek Powell
3/26/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Prior work has shown that large language models (LLMs) can predict human attitudes based on other attitudes, but this work has largely focused on predictions from highly similar and interrelated attitudes. In contrast, human attitudes are often strongly associated even across disparate and dissimilar topics. Using a novel dataset of human responses toward diverse attitude statements, we found that a frontier language model (GPT-4o) was able to recreate the pairwise correlations among individual attitudes and to predict individuals' attitudes from one another. Crucially, in an advance over prior work, we tested GPT-4o's ability to predict in the absence of surface-similarity between attitudes, finding that while surface similarity improves prediction accuracy, the model was still highly-capable of generating meaningful social inferences between dissimilar attitudes. Altogether, our findings indicate that LLMs capture crucial aspects of the deeper, latent structure of human belief systems.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ma2025large,
  title  = {Can Large Language Models Predict Associations Among Human Attitudes?},
  author = {Ana Ma and Derek Powell},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.21011},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21011v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.21011.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.21011)

Discussion