Understanding Co-speech Gestures in-the-wild

Sindhu B Hegde, K R Prajwal, Taein Kwon, Andrew Zisserman
3/28/2025
cs.CV

No official code found. Best implementation: Sindhu-Hegde/jegal (24 stars, last commit 2025-10-31).

Abstract

Co-speech gestures play a vital role in non-verbal communication. In this paper, we introduce a new framework for co-speech gesture understanding in the wild. Specifically, we propose three new tasks and benchmarks to evaluate a model's capability to comprehend gesture-speech-text associations: (i) gesture based retrieval, (ii) gesture word spotting, and (iii) active speaker detection using gestures. We present a new approach that learns a tri-modal video-gesture-speech-text representation to solve these tasks. By leveraging a combination of global phrase contrastive loss and local gesture-word coupling loss, we demonstrate that a strong gesture representation can be learned in a weakly supervised manner from videos in the wild. Our learned representations outperform previous methods, including large vision-language models (VLMs). Further analysis reveals that speech and text modalities capture distinct gesture related signals, underscoring the advantages of learning a shared tri-modal embedding space. The dataset, model, and code are available at: https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/research/jegal.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Sindhu-Hegde/jegalCommunity70%

Official code for the paper "Understanding Co-speech Gestures in-the-wild"

241PythonMar 27, 202511 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hegde2025understanding,
  title  = {Understanding Co-speech Gestures in-the-wild},
  author = {Sindhu B Hegde and K R Prajwal and Taein Kwon and Andrew Zisserman},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.22668},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22668v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.22668.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.22668)

Discussion