Convolutional Neural Networks Can (Meta-)Learn the Same-Different Relation

Max Gupta, Sunayana Rane, R. Thomas McCoy, Thomas L. Griffiths
3/29/2025
cs.CVcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have come to match and exceed human performance in many settings, the tasks these models optimize for are largely constrained to the level of individual objects, such as classification and captioning. Humans remain vastly superior to CNNs in visual tasks involving relations, including the ability to identify two objects as `same' or `different'. A number of studies have shown that while CNNs can be coaxed into learning the same-different relation in some settings, they tend to generalize poorly to other instances of this relation. In this work we show that the same CNN architectures that fail to generalize the same-different relation with conventional training are able to succeed when trained via meta-learning, which explicitly encourages abstraction and generalization across tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gupta2025convolutional,
  title  = {Convolutional Neural Networks Can (Meta-)Learn the Same-Different Relation},
  author = {Max Gupta and Sunayana Rane and R. Thomas McCoy and Thomas L. Griffiths},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.23212},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23212v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.23212.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.23212)

Discussion