What Makes an Evaluation Useful? Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

Gil Gekker, Meirav Segal, Dan Lahav, Omer Nevo
3/30/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Following the rapid increase in Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities in recent years, the AI community has voiced concerns regarding possible safety risks. To support decision-making on the safe use and development of AI systems, there is a growing need for high-quality evaluations of dangerous model capabilities. While several attempts to provide such evaluations have been made, a clear definition of what constitutes a "good evaluation" has yet to be agreed upon. In this practitioners' perspective paper, we present a set of best practices for safety evaluations, drawing on prior work in model evaluation and illustrated through cybersecurity examples. We first discuss the steps of the initial thought process, which connects threat modeling to evaluation design. Then, we provide the characteristics and parameters that make an evaluation useful. Finally, we address additional considerations as we move from building specific evaluations to building a full and comprehensive evaluation suite.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{gekker2025what,
  title  = {What Makes an Evaluation Useful? Common Pitfalls and Best Practices},
  author = {Gil Gekker and Meirav Segal and Dan Lahav and Omer Nevo},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2503.23424},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23424v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2503.23424.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2503.23424)

Discussion