Explainable post-training bias mitigation with distribution-based fairness metrics

Ryan Franks, Alexey Miroshnikov, Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos
4/1/2025
cs.LGmath.PR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We develop a novel bias mitigation framework with distribution-based fairness constraints suitable for producing demographically blind and explainable machine-learning models across a wide range of fairness levels. This is accomplished through post-processing, allowing fairer models to be generated efficiently without retraining the underlying model. Our framework, which is based on stochastic gradient descent, can be applied to a wide range of model types, with a particular emphasis on the post-processing of gradient-boosted decision trees. Additionally, we design a broad family of global fairness metrics, along with differentiable and consistent estimators compatible with our framework, building on previous work. We empirically test our methodology on a variety of datasets and compare it with alternative post-processing approaches, including Bayesian search, optimal transport projection, and direct neural network training.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{franks2025explainable,
  title  = {Explainable post-training bias mitigation with distribution-based fairness metrics},
  author = {Ryan Franks and Alexey Miroshnikov and Konstandinos Kotsiopoulos},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.01223},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01223v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.01223.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.01223)

Discussion