Two is Better than One: Efficient Ensemble Defense for Robust and Compact Models

Yoojin Jung, B. Song
2/10/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Deep learning-based computer vision systems adopt complex and large architectures to improve performance, yet they face challenges in deployment on resource-constrained mobile and edge devices. To address this issue, model compression techniques such as pruning, quantization, and matrix factorization have been proposed; however, these compressed models are often highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. We introduce the Efficient Ensemble Defense (EED) technique, which diversifies the compression of a single base model based on different pruning importance scores and enhances ensemble diversity to achieve high adversarial robustness and resource efficiency. EED dynamically determines the number of necessary sub-models during the inference stage, minimizing unnecessary computations while maintaining high robustness. On the CIFAR- 10 and SVHN datasets, EED demonstrated state-of-the-art robustness performance compared to existing adversarial pruning techniques, along with an inference speed improvement of up to 1.86 times. This proves that EED is a powerful defense solution in resource-constrained environments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jung2026better,
  title  = {Two is Better than One: Efficient Ensemble Defense for Robust and Compact Models},
  author = {Yoojin Jung and B. Song},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2504.04747},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04747},
  journal = {CVPR 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.04747.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.04747)

Discussion