A Practical Approach to using Supervised Machine Learning Models to Classify Aviation Safety Occurrences

Bryan Y. Siow
4/12/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper describes a practical approach of using supervised machine learning (ML) models to assist safety investigators to classify aviation occurrences into either incident or serious incident categories. Our implementation currently deployed as a ML web application is trained on a labelled dataset derived from publicly available aviation investigation reports. A selection of five supervised learning models (Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifier, XGBoost and K-Nearest Neighbors) were evaluated. This paper showed the best performing ML algorithm was the Random Forest Classifier with accuracy = 0.77, F1 Score = 0.78 and MCC = 0.51 (average of 100 sample runs). The study had also explored the effect of applying Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to the imbalanced dataset, and the overall observation ranged from no significant effect to substantial degradation in performance for some of the models after the SMOTE adjustment.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{siow2025practical,
  title  = {A Practical Approach to using Supervised Machine Learning Models to Classify Aviation Safety Occurrences},
  author = {Bryan Y. Siow},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.09063},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09063v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.09063.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.09063)

Discussion