Could Thinking Multilingually Empower LLM Reasoning?

Changjiang Gao, Xu Huang, Wenhao Zhu, Shujian Huang, Lei Li +1 more
4/16/2025
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: CONE-MT/multilingual_reasoning (7 stars, last commit 2025-04-17).

Abstract

Previous work indicates that large language models exhibit a significant "English bias", i.e. they often perform better when tasks are presented in English. Interestingly, we have observed that using certain other languages in reasoning tasks can yield better performance than English. However, this phenomenon remains under-explored. In this paper, we explore the upper bound of harnessing multilingualism in reasoning tasks, suggesting that multilingual reasoning promises significantly (by nearly 10 Acc@$k$ points) and robustly (tolerance for variations in translation quality and language choice) higher upper bounds than English-only reasoning. Besides analyzing the reason behind the upper bound and challenges in reaching it, we also find that common answer selection methods cannot achieve this upper bound, due to their limitations and biases. These insights could pave the way for future research aimed at fully harnessing the potential of multilingual reasoning in LLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

72C++, ShellMar 11, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gao2025could,
  title  = {Could Thinking Multilingually Empower LLM Reasoning?},
  author = {Changjiang Gao and Xu Huang and Wenhao Zhu and Shujian Huang and Lei Li and Fei Yuan},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.11833},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11833v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.11833.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.11833)

Discussion