Active Human Feedback Collection via Neural Contextual Dueling Bandits

Arun Verma, Xiaoqiang Lin, Zhongxiang Dai, Daniela Rus, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
4/16/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Collecting human preference feedback is often expensive, leading recent works to develop principled algorithms to select them more efficiently. However, these works assume that the underlying reward function is linear, an assumption that does not hold in many real-life applications, such as online recommendation and LLM alignment. To address this limitation, we propose Neural-ADB, an algorithm based on the neural contextual dueling bandit framework that provides a principled and practical method for collecting human preference feedback when the underlying latent reward function is non-linear. We theoretically show that when preference feedback follows the Bradley-Terry-Luce model, the worst sub-optimality gap of the policy learned by Neural-ADB decreases at a sub-linear rate as the preference dataset increases. Our experimental results on preference datasets further corroborate the effectiveness of Neural-ADB.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{verma2025active,
  title  = {Active Human Feedback Collection via Neural Contextual Dueling Bandits},
  author = {Arun Verma and Xiaoqiang Lin and Zhongxiang Dai and Daniela Rus and Bryan Kian Hsiang Low},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.12016},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12016v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.12016.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.12016)

Discussion