Leakage and Interpretability in Concept-Based Models

Enrico Parisini, Tapabrata Chakraborti, Chris Harbron, Ben D. MacArthur, Christopher R. S. Banerji
4/18/2025
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML

No official code found. Best implementation: enricoparisini/xai-concept-leakage (2 stars, MIT, last commit 2025-10-16).

Abstract

Concept Bottleneck Models aim to improve interpretability by predicting high-level intermediate concepts, representing a promising approach for deployment in high-risk scenarios. However, they are known to suffer from information leakage, whereby models exploit unintended information encoded within the learned concepts. We introduce an information-theoretic framework to rigorously characterise and quantify leakage, and define two complementary measures: the concepts-task leakage (CTL) and interconcept leakage (ICL) scores. We show that these measures are strongly predictive of model behaviour under interventions and outperform existing alternatives in robustness and reliability. Using this framework, we identify the primary causes of leakage and provide strong evidence that Concept Embedding Models exhibit substantial leakage regardless of the hyperparameters choice. Finally, we propose practical guidelines for designing concept-based models to reduce leakage and ensure interpretability.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

Repository for the paper "Leakage and Interpretability in Concept-Based Models"

20Shell, PythonMay 14, 20251 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{parisini2025leakage,
  title  = {Leakage and Interpretability in Concept-Based Models},
  author = {Enrico Parisini and Tapabrata Chakraborti and Chris Harbron and Ben D. MacArthur and Christopher R. S. Banerji},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.14094},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14094v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.14094.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.14094)

Discussion