MCMC for Bayesian estimation of Differential Privacy from Membership Inference Attacks

Ceren Yildirim, Kamer Kaya, Sinan Yildirim, Erkay Savas
4/23/2025
cs.LGstat.ML

No official code found. Best implementation: cerenyildirim/MCMC_for_Bayesian_estimation (0 stars, last commit 2025-11-18).

Abstract

We propose a new framework for Bayesian estimation of differential privacy, incorporating evidence from multiple membership inference attacks (MIA). Bayesian estimation is carried out via a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, named MCMC-DP-Est, which provides an estimate of the full posterior distribution of the privacy parameter (e.g., instead of just credible intervals). Critically, the proposed method does not assume that privacy auditing is performed with the most powerful attack on the worst-case (dataset, challenge point) pair, which is typically unrealistic. Instead, MCMC-DP-Est jointly estimates the strengths of MIAs used and the privacy of the training algorithm, yielding a more cautious privacy analysis. We also present an economical way to generate measurements for the performance of an MIA that is to be used by the MCMC method to estimate privacy. We present the use of the methods with numerical examples with both artificial and real data.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

This repository includes the implementation of the paper "MCMC for Bayesian estimation of Differential Privacy from Membership Inference Attacks".

00MATLAB, PythonApr 18, 202511 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yildirim2025mcmc,
  title  = {MCMC for Bayesian estimation of Differential Privacy from Membership Inference Attacks},
  author = {Ceren Yildirim and Kamer Kaya and Sinan Yildirim and Erkay Savas},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.16683},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16683v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.16683.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.16683)

Discussion