Signal Recovery from Random Dot-Product Graphs Under Local Differential Privacy

Siddharth Vishwanath, Jonathan Hehir
4/24/2025
cs.LGmath.STstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We consider the problem of recovering latent information from graphs under $\varepsilon$-edge local differential privacy where the presence of relationships/edges between two users/vertices remains confidential, even from the data curator. For the class of generalized random dot-product graphs, we show that a standard local differential privacy mechanism induces a specific geometric distortion in the latent positions. Leveraging this insight, we show that consistent recovery of the latent positions is achievable by appropriately adjusting the statistical inference procedure for the privatized graph. Furthermore, we prove that our procedure is nearly minimax-optimal under local edge differential privacy constraints. Lastly, we show that this framework allows for consistent recovery of geometric and topological information underlying the latent positions, as encoded in their persistence diagrams. Our results extend previous work from the private community detection literature to a substantially richer class of models and inferential tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{vishwanath2025signal,
  title  = {Signal Recovery from Random Dot-Product Graphs Under Local Differential Privacy},
  author = {Siddharth Vishwanath and Jonathan Hehir},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.17274},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17274v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.17274.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.17274)

Discussion