Multilingual Performance Biases of Large Language Models in Education

Vansh Gupta, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Vilém Zouhar, Donya Rooein, Mrinmaya Sachan
4/24/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: eth-lre/multilingual-educational-llm-bias (1 star, last commit 2025-04-25).

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in educational settings. These applications expand beyond English, though current LLMs remain primarily English-centric. In this work, we ascertain if their use in education settings in non-English languages is warranted. We evaluated the performance of popular LLMs on four educational tasks: identifying student misconceptions, providing targeted feedback, interactive tutoring, and grading translations in eight languages (Mandarin, Hindi, Arabic, German, Farsi, Telugu, Ukrainian, Czech) in addition to English. We find that the performance on these tasks somewhat corresponds to the amount of language represented in training data, with lower-resource languages having poorer task performance. Although the models perform reasonably well in most languages, the frequent performance drop from English is significant. Thus, we recommend that practitioners first verify that the LLM works well in the target language for their educational task before deployment.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Data and code for "Multilingual Performance Biases of Large Language Models in Education"

10PythonApr 24, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gupta2025multilingual,
  title  = {Multilingual Performance Biases of Large Language Models in Education},
  author = {Vansh Gupta and Sankalan Pal Chowdhury and Vilém Zouhar and Donya Rooein and Mrinmaya Sachan},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.17720},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17720v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.17720.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.17720)

Discussion