An Axiomatic Assessment of Entropy- and Variance-based Uncertainty Quantification in Regression

Christopher Bülte, Yusuf Sale, Timo Löhr, Paul Hofman, Gitta Kutyniok +1 more
4/25/2025
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial in machine learning, yet most (axiomatic) studies of uncertainty measures focus on classification, leaving a gap in regression settings with limited formal justification and evaluations. In this work, we introduce a set of axioms to rigorously assess measures of aleatoric, epistemic, and total uncertainty in supervised regression. By utilizing a predictive exponential family, we can generalize commonly used approaches for uncertainty representation and corresponding uncertainty measures. More specifically, we analyze the widely used entropy- and variance-based measures regarding limitations and challenges. Our findings provide a principled foundation for uncertainty quantification in regression, offering theoretical insights and practical guidelines for reliable uncertainty assessment.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{blte2025axiomatic,
  title  = {An Axiomatic Assessment of Entropy- and Variance-based Uncertainty Quantification in Regression},
  author = {Christopher Bülte and Yusuf Sale and Timo Löhr and Paul Hofman and Gitta Kutyniok and Eyke Hüllermeier},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.18433},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18433v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.18433.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.18433)

Discussion