Critical Challenges and Guidelines in Evaluating Synthetic Tabular Data: A Systematic Review

Nazia Nafis, Inaki Esnaola, Alvaro Martinez-Perez, Maria-Cruz Villa-Uriol, Venet Osmani
4/10/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Generating synthetic tabular data can be challenging, however evaluation of their quality is just as challenging, if not more. This systematic review sheds light on the critical importance of rigorous evaluation of synthetic health data to ensure reliability, relevance, and their appropriate use. Based on screening of 1766 papers and a detailed review of 101 papers we identified key challenges, including lack of consensus on evaluation methods, improper use of evaluation metrics, limited input from domain experts, inadequate reporting of dataset characteristics, and limited reproducibility of results. In response, we provide several guidelines on the generation and evaluation of synthetic data, to allow the community to unlock and fully harness the transformative potential of synthetic data and accelerate innovation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{nafis2025critical,
  title  = {Critical Challenges and Guidelines in Evaluating Synthetic Tabular Data: A Systematic Review},
  author = {Nazia Nafis and Inaki Esnaola and Alvaro Martinez-Perez and Maria-Cruz Villa-Uriol and Venet Osmani},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2504.18544},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18544v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2504.18544.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2504.18544)

Discussion