Proper Noun Diacritization for Arabic Wikipedia: A Benchmark Dataset

Rawan Bondok, Mayar Nassar, Salam Khalifa, Kurt Micallef, Nizar Habash
5/5/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Proper nouns in Arabic Wikipedia are frequently undiacritized, creating ambiguity in pronunciation and interpretation, especially for transliterated named entities of foreign origin. While transliteration and diacritization have been well-studied separately in Arabic NLP, their intersection remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce a new manually diacritized dataset of Arabic proper nouns of various origins with their English Wikipedia equivalent glosses, and present the challenges and guidelines we followed to create it. We benchmark GPT-4o on the task of recovering full diacritization given the undiacritized Arabic and English forms, and analyze its performance. Achieving 73% accuracy, our results underscore both the difficulty of the task and the need for improved models and resources. We release our dataset to facilitate further research on Arabic Wikipedia proper noun diacritization.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bondok2025proper,
  title  = {Proper Noun Diacritization for Arabic Wikipedia: A Benchmark Dataset},
  author = {Rawan Bondok and Mayar Nassar and Salam Khalifa and Kurt Micallef and Nizar Habash},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.02656},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02656v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.02656.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.02656)

Discussion