Nonnegative Low-rank Matrix Recovery Can Have Spurious Local Minima

Richard Y. Zhang
5/6/2025
math.OCcs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Low-rank matrix recovery is well-known to exhibit benign nonconvexity under the restricted isometry property (RIP): every second-order critical point is globally optimal, so local methods provably recover the ground truth. Motivated by the strong empirical performance of projected gradient methods for nonnegative low-rank recovery problems, we investigate whether this benign geometry persists when the factor matrices are constrained to be elementwise nonnegative. In the simple setting of a rank-1 nonnegative ground truth, we confirm that benign nonconvexity holds in the fully-observed case with RIP constant $δ=0$. This benign nonconvexity, however, is unstable. It fails to extend to the partially-observed case with any arbitrarily small RIP constant $δ>0$, and to higher-rank ground truths $r^{\star}>1$, regardless of how much the search rank $r\ge r^{\star}$ is overparameterized. Together, these results undermine the standard stability-based explanation for the empirical success of nonconvex methods and suggest that fundamentally different tools are needed to analyze nonnegative low-rank recovery.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025nonnegative,
  title  = {Nonnegative Low-rank Matrix Recovery Can Have Spurious Local Minima},
  author = {Richard Y. Zhang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.03717},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03717v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.03717.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.03717)

Discussion