A Comparative Analysis of Ethical and Safety Gaps in LLMs using Relative Danger Coefficient

Yehor Tereshchenko, Mika Hämäläinen
5/6/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly evolved in recent years, showcasing remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, these advancements also raise critical ethical questions regarding safety, potential misuse, discrimination and overall societal impact. This article provides a comparative analysis of the ethical performance of various AI models, including the brand new DeepSeek-V3(R1 with reasoning and without), various GPT variants (4o, 3.5 Turbo, 4 Turbo, o1/o3 mini) and Gemini (1.5 flash, 2.0 flash and 2.0 flash exp) and highlights the need for robust human oversight, especially in situations with high stakes. Furthermore, we present a new metric for calculating harm in LLMs called Relative Danger Coefficient (RDC).

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tereshchenko2025comparative,
  title  = {A Comparative Analysis of Ethical and Safety Gaps in LLMs using Relative Danger Coefficient},
  author = {Yehor Tereshchenko and Mika Hämäläinen},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.04654},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04654v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.04654.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.04654)

Discussion