Benchmarking LLM Faithfulness in RAG with Evolving Leaderboards

Manveer Singh Tamber, Forrest Sheng Bao, Chenyu Xu, Ge Luo, Suleman Kazi +5 more
5/7/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

Official code: vectara/FaithJudge (19 stars, last commit 2025-11-11).

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) aims to reduce hallucinations by grounding responses in external context, yet large language models (LLMs) still frequently introduce unsupported information or contradictions even when provided with relevant context. This paper presents two complementary efforts at Vectara to measure and benchmark LLM faithfulness in RAG. First, we describe our original hallucination leaderboard, which has tracked hallucination rates for LLMs since 2023 using our HHEM hallucination detection model. Motivated by limitations observed in current hallucination detection methods, we introduce FaithJudge, an LLM-as-a-judge framework that leverages a pool of diverse human-annotated hallucination examples to substantially improve the automated hallucination evaluation of LLMs. We introduce an enhanced hallucination leaderboard centered on FaithJudge that benchmarks LLMs on RAG faithfulness in summarization, question-answering, and data-to-text generation tasks. FaithJudge enables a more reliable benchmarking of LLM hallucinations in RAG and supports the development of more trustworthy generative AI systems: https://github.com/vectara/FaithJudge.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

vectara/FaithJudgeOfficial100%
195PythonApr 9, 202511 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{tamber2025benchmarking,
  title  = {Benchmarking LLM Faithfulness in RAG with Evolving Leaderboards},
  author = {Manveer Singh Tamber and Forrest Sheng Bao and Chenyu Xu and Ge Luo and Suleman Kazi and Minseok Bae and Miaoran Li and Ofer Mendelevitch and Renyi Qu and Jimmy Lin},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.04847},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04847v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.04847.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.04847)

Discussion