Nearly Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning with Label Proportions

Robert Busa-Fekete, Travis Dick, Claudio Gentile, Haim Kaplan, Tomer Koren +1 more
5/8/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate Learning from Label Proportions (LLP), a partial information setting where examples in a training set are grouped into bags, and only aggregate label values in each bag are available. Despite the partial observability, the goal is still to achieve small regret at the level of individual examples. We give results on the sample complexity of LLP under square loss, showing that our sample complexity is essentially optimal. From an algorithmic viewpoint, we rely on carefully designed variants of Empirical Risk Minimization, and Stochastic Gradient Descent algorithms, combined with ad hoc variance reduction techniques. On one hand, our theoretical results improve in important ways on the existing literature on LLP, specifically in the way the sample complexity depends on the bag size. On the other hand, we validate our algorithmic solutions on several datasets, demonstrating improved empirical performance (better accuracy for less samples) against recent baselines.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{busafekete2025nearly,
  title  = {Nearly Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning with Label Proportions},
  author = {Robert Busa-Fekete and Travis Dick and Claudio Gentile and Haim Kaplan and Tomer Koren and Uri Stemmer},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.05355},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05355v2},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.05355.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.05355)

Discussion