Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization for Long-Form Question Answering

Jingfeng Chen, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Junlin Wang, Kaiwei Luo, Bhuwan Dhingra
5/14/2025
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: JingfengSteven/ACPO (0 stars, last commit 2025-11-10).

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce factoid hallucinations - plausible yet incorrect answers. A common mitigation strategy is model alignment, which improves factual accuracy by training on curated (factual, non-factual) pairs. However, this approach often relies on a stronger model (e.g., GPT-4) or an external knowledge base to assess factual correctness that may not always be accessible. Addressing this, we propose Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization (ACPO), a self-supervised preference-tuning method that enhances factual accuracy without external supervision. ACPO leverages atomic consistency signals (i.e., the agreement of individual facts across multiple stochastic responses) to identify high- and low-quality data pairs for model alignment. Despite being fully self-supervised, ACPO outperforms the strong supervised alignment baseline by 1.95 points averaged across Phi-3 and Llama3 on the LongFact and BioGen datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving factual reliability without relying on external models or knowledge bases.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

JingfengSteven/ACPOCommunity100%
00PythonMar 29, 202511 months agoNOASSERTION

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2025atomic,
  title  = {Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization for Long-Form Question Answering},
  author = {Jingfeng Chen and Raghuveer Thirukovalluru and Junlin Wang and Kaiwei Luo and Bhuwan Dhingra},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.09039},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09039v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.09039.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.09039)

Discussion