Benchmarking and Confidence Evaluation of LALMs For Temporal Reasoning

Debarpan Bhattacharya, Apoorva Kulkarni, Sriram Ganapathy
5/19/2025
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: iiscleap/Audio-LLM-benchmarking-uncertainty (8 stars, CC0-1.0, last commit 2025-10-12).

Abstract

The popular success of text-based large language models (LLM) has streamlined the attention of the multimodal community to combine other modalities like vision and audio along with text to achieve similar multimodal capabilities. In this quest, large audio language models (LALMs) have to be evaluated on reasoning related tasks which are different from traditional classification or generation tasks. Towards this goal, we propose a novel dataset called temporal reasoning evaluation of audio (TREA). We benchmark open-source LALMs and observe that they are consistently behind human capabilities on the tasks in the TREA dataset. While evaluating LALMs, we also propose an uncertainty metric, which computes the invariance of the model to semantically identical perturbations of the input. Our analysis shows that the accuracy and uncertainty metrics are not necessarily correlated and thus, points to a need for wholesome evaluation of LALMs for high-stakes applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

CC0-1.0

Official Implementation of the Interspeech, 2025 paper: Benchmarking and Confidence Evaluation of LALMs For Temporal Reasoning

80Shell, PythonMay 19, 20251 years agoCC0-1.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bhattacharya2025benchmarking,
  title  = {Benchmarking and Confidence Evaluation of LALMs For Temporal Reasoning},
  author = {Debarpan Bhattacharya and Apoorva Kulkarni and Sriram Ganapathy},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.13115},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13115v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.13115.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.13115)

Discussion