Pairwise Evaluation of Accent Similarity in Speech Synthesis

Jinzuomu Zhong, Suyuan Liu, Dan Wells, Korin Richmond
5/20/2025
eess.AScs.CLcs.SD

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Despite growing interest in generating high-fidelity accents, evaluating accent similarity in speech synthesis has been underexplored. We aim to enhance both subjective and objective evaluation methods for accent similarity. Subjectively, we refine the XAB listening test by adding components that achieve higher statistical significance with fewer listeners and lower costs. Our method involves providing listeners with transcriptions, having them highlight perceived accent differences, and implementing meticulous screening for reliability. Objectively, we utilise pronunciation-related metrics, based on distances between vowel formants and phonetic posteriorgrams, to evaluate accent generation. Comparative experiments reveal that these metrics, alongside accent similarity, speaker similarity, and Mel Cepstral Distortion, can be used. Moreover, our findings underscore significant limitations of common metrics like Word Error Rate in assessing underrepresented accents.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhong2025pairwise,
  title  = {Pairwise Evaluation of Accent Similarity in Speech Synthesis},
  author = {Jinzuomu Zhong and Suyuan Liu and Dan Wells and Korin Richmond},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.14410},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14410v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.14410.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.14410)

Discussion