Steering LLM Reasoning Through Bias-Only Adaptation

Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Gorbatovski, Artem Cherepanov, Boris Shaposhnikov, Nikita Balagansky +1 more
5/24/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: corl-team/steering-reasoning (57 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2025-10-07).

Abstract

We show that training a single $d$-dimensional steering vector per layer with reinforcement learning, while freezing all base weights, matches the accuracy of fully RL-tuned reasoning models on mathematical-reasoning tasks. On an 8 billion-parameter model this adds only $\approx 0.0016\%$ additional parameters and reproduces performance across a range of base models and mathematical-reasoning benchmarks. These results tighten the upper bound on the parameter budget required for high-level chain-of-thought reasoning, indicating that millions of adapter weights are unnecessary. The minimal trainable footprint reduces optimizer memory and inter-GPU communication, lowering the overall cost of fine-tuning. Moreover, a logit-lens analysis shows that the learned vectors amplify coherent token directions, providing clearer insight into the model's internal computations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Apache-2.0

Official implementation of "Steering LLM Reasoning Through Bias-Only Adaptation" and "Small Vectors, Big Effects: A Mechanistic Study of RL-Induced Reasoning via Steering Vectors"

575Shell, PythonSep 11, 20251 years agoApache-2.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sinii2025steering,
  title  = {Steering LLM Reasoning Through Bias-Only Adaptation},
  author = {Viacheslav Sinii and Alexey Gorbatovski and Artem Cherepanov and Boris Shaposhnikov and Nikita Balagansky and Daniil Gavrilov},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.18706},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18706v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.18706.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.18706)

Discussion