New Perspectives on the Polyak Stepsize: Surrogate Functions and Negative Results

Francesco Orabona, Ryan D'Orazio
5/26/2025
math.OCcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The Polyak stepsize has been proven to be a fundamental stepsize in convex optimization, giving near optimal gradient descent rates across a wide range of assumptions. The universality of the Polyak stepsize has also inspired many stochastic variants, with theoretical guarantees and strong empirical performance. Despite the many theoretical results, our understanding of the convergence properties and shortcomings of the Polyak stepsize or its variants is both incomplete and fractured across different analyses. We propose a new, unified, and simple perspective for the Polyak stepsize and its variants as gradient descent on a surrogate loss. We show that each variant is equivalent to minimize a surrogate function with stepsizes that adapt to a guaranteed local curvature. Our general surrogate loss perspective is then used to provide a unified analysis of existing variants across different assumptions. Moreover, we show a number of negative results proving that the non-convergence results in some of the upper bounds is indeed real.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{orabona2025perspectives,
  title  = {New Perspectives on the Polyak Stepsize: Surrogate Functions and Negative Results},
  author = {Francesco Orabona and Ryan D'Orazio},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.20219},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20219v1},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.20219.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.20219)

Discussion