Test-time augmentation improves efficiency in conformal prediction

Divya Shanmugam, Helen Lu, Swami Sankaranarayanan, John Guttag
5/28/2025
cs.LGcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

A conformal classifier produces a set of predicted classes and provides a probabilistic guarantee that the set includes the true class. Unfortunately, it is often the case that conformal classifiers produce uninformatively large sets. In this work, we show that test-time augmentation (TTA)--a technique that introduces inductive biases during inference--reduces the size of the sets produced by conformal classifiers. Our approach is flexible, computationally efficient, and effective. It can be combined with any conformal score, requires no model retraining, and reduces prediction set sizes by 10%-14% on average. We conduct an evaluation of the approach spanning three datasets, three models, two established conformal scoring methods, different guarantee strengths, and several distribution shifts to show when and why test-time augmentation is a useful addition to the conformal pipeline.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{shanmugam2025testtime,
  title  = {Test-time augmentation improves efficiency in conformal prediction},
  author = {Divya Shanmugam and Helen Lu and Swami Sankaranarayanan and John Guttag},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.22764},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22764v1},
  journal = {CVPR 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.22764.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.22764)

Discussion