Talent or Luck? Evaluating Attribution Bias in Large Language Models

Chahat Raj, Mahika Banerjee, Aylin Caliskan, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Ziwei Zhu
5/28/2025
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: chahatraj/TalentorLuck (1 star, last commit 2025-05-23).

Abstract

When a student fails an exam, do we tend to blame their effort or the test's difficulty? Attribution, defined as how reasons are assigned to event outcomes, shapes perceptions, reinforces stereotypes, and influences decisions. Attribution Theory in social psychology explains how humans assign responsibility for events using implicit cognition, attributing causes to internal (e.g., effort, ability) or external (e.g., task difficulty, luck) factors. LLMs' attribution of event outcomes based on demographics carries important fairness implications. Most works exploring social biases in LLMs focus on surface-level associations or isolated stereotypes. This work proposes a cognitively grounded bias evaluation framework to identify how models' reasoning disparities channelize biases toward demographic groups.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

10PythonMay 19, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{raj2025talent,
  title  = {Talent or Luck? Evaluating Attribution Bias in Large Language Models},
  author = {Chahat Raj and Mahika Banerjee and Aylin Caliskan and Antonios Anastasopoulos and Ziwei Zhu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.22910},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22910v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.22910.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.22910)

Discussion