Characterising the Inductive Biases of Neural Networks on Boolean Data

Chris Mingard, Lukas Seier, Niclas Göring, Andrei-Vlad Badelita, Charles London +1 more
5/29/2025
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Deep neural networks are renowned for their ability to generalise well across diverse tasks, even when heavily overparameterized. Existing works offer only partial explanations (for example, the NTK-based task-model alignment explanation neglects feature learning). Here, we provide an end-to-end, analytically tractable case study that links a network's inductive prior, its training dynamics including feature learning, and its eventual generalisation. Specifically, we exploit the one-to-one correspondence between depth-2 discrete fully connected networks and disjunctive normal form (DNF) formulas by training on Boolean functions. Under a Monte Carlo learning algorithm, our model exhibits predictable training dynamics and the emergence of interpretable features. This framework allows us to trace, in detail, how inductive bias and feature formation drive generalisation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mingard2025characterising,
  title  = {Characterising the Inductive Biases of Neural Networks on Boolean Data},
  author = {Chris Mingard and Lukas Seier and Niclas Göring and Andrei-Vlad Badelita and Charles London and Ard Louis},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.24060},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24060v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.24060.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.24060)

Discussion