Is Your Explanation Reliable: Confidence-Aware Explanation on Graph Neural Networks

Jiaxing Zhang, Xiaoou Liu, Dongsheng Luo, Hua Wei
5/31/2025
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Explaining Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) has garnered significant attention due to the need for interpretability, enabling users to understand the behavior of these black-box models better and extract valuable insights from their predictions. While numerous post-hoc instance-level explanation methods have been proposed to interpret GNN predictions, the reliability of these explanations remains uncertain, particularly in the out-of-distribution or unknown test datasets. In this paper, we address this challenge by introducing an explainer framework with the confidence scoring module ( ConfExplainer), grounded in theoretical principle, which is generalized graph information bottleneck with confidence constraint (GIB-CC), that quantifies the reliability of generated explanations. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach, highlighting the effectiveness of the confidence score in enhancing the trustworthiness and robustness of GNN explanations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025your,
  title  = {Is Your Explanation Reliable: Confidence-Aware Explanation on Graph Neural Networks},
  author = {Jiaxing Zhang and Xiaoou Liu and Dongsheng Luo and Hua Wei},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.00437},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00437v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.00437.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.00437)

Discussion