Clinical Annotations for Automatic Stuttering Severity Assessment

Ana Rita Valente, Rufael Marew, Hawau Olamide Toyin, Hamdan Al-Ali, Anelise Bohnen +4 more
5/31/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: mbzuai-nlp/CASA (3 stars, last commit 2026-01-15).

Abstract

Stuttering is a complex disorder that requires specialized expertise for effective assessment and treatment. This paper presents an effort to enhance the FluencyBank dataset with a new stuttering annotation scheme based on established clinical standards. To achieve high-quality annotations, we hired expert clinicians to label the data, ensuring that the resulting annotations mirror real-world clinical expertise. The annotations are multi-modal, incorporating audiovisual features for the detection and classification of stuttering moments, secondary behaviors, and tension scores. In addition to individual annotations, we additionally provide a test set with highly reliable annotations based on expert consensus for assessing individual annotators and machine learning models. Our experiments and analysis illustrate the complexity of this task that necessitates extensive clinical expertise for valid training and evaluation of stuttering assessment models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

mbzuai-nlp/CASACommunity100%

Clinical Annotations for Stuttering Assessment

32PythonMay 29, 20259 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{valente2025clinical,
  title  = {Clinical Annotations for Automatic Stuttering Severity Assessment},
  author = {Ana Rita Valente and Rufael Marew and Hawau Olamide Toyin and Hamdan Al-Ali and Anelise Bohnen and Inma Becerra and Elsa Marta Soares and Goncalo Leal and Hanan Aldarmaki},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.00644},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00644v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.00644.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.00644)

Discussion