Does It Make Sense to Speak of Introspection in Large Language Models?

Iulia M. Comsa, Murray Shanahan
6/5/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit compelling linguistic behaviour, and sometimes offer self-reports, that is to say statements about their own nature, inner workings, or behaviour. In humans, such reports are often attributed to a faculty of introspection and are typically linked to consciousness. This raises the question of how to interpret self-reports produced by LLMs, given their increasing linguistic fluency and cognitive capabilities. To what extent (if any) can the concept of introspection be meaningfully applied to LLMs? Here, we present and critique two examples of apparent introspective self-report from LLMs. In the first example, an LLM attempts to describe the process behind its own "creative" writing, and we argue this is not a valid example of introspection. In the second example, an LLM correctly infers the value of its own temperature parameter, and we argue that this can be legitimately considered a minimal example of introspection, albeit one that is (presumably) not accompanied by conscious experience.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{comsa2025does,
  title  = {Does It Make Sense to Speak of Introspection in Large Language Models?},
  author = {Iulia M. Comsa and Murray Shanahan},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.05068},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05068v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.05068.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.05068)

Discussion