The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by Algorithm

Tianyi Alex Qiu, Zhonghao He, Tejasveer Chugh, Max Kleiman-Weiner
6/6/2025
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The training and deployment of large language models (LLMs) create a feedback loop with human users: models learn human beliefs from data, reinforce these beliefs with generated content, reabsorb the reinforced beliefs, and feed them back to users again and again. This dynamic resembles an echo chamber. We hypothesize that this feedback loop entrenches the existing values and beliefs of users, leading to a loss of diversity and potentially the lock-in of false beliefs. We formalize this hypothesis and test it empirically with agent-based LLM simulations and real-world GPT usage data. Analysis reveals sudden but sustained drops in diversity after the release of new GPT iterations, consistent with the hypothesized human-AI feedback loop. Code and data available at https://thelockinhypothesis.com

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{qiu2025lockin,
  title  = {The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by Algorithm},
  author = {Tianyi Alex Qiu and Zhonghao He and Tejasveer Chugh and Max Kleiman-Weiner},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.06166},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06166v1},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.06166.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.06166)

Discussion