Preserving Task-Relevant Information Under Linear Concept Removal

Floris Holstege, Shauli Ravfogel, Bram Wouters
6/12/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Modern neural networks often encode unwanted concepts alongside task-relevant information, leading to fairness and interpretability concerns. Existing post-hoc approaches can remove undesired concepts but often degrade useful signals. We introduce SPLINCE-Simultaneous Projection for LINear concept removal and Covariance prEservation - which eliminates sensitive concepts from representations while exactly preserving their covariance with a target label. SPLINCE achieves this via an oblique projection that 'splices out' the unwanted direction yet protects important label correlations. Theoretically, it is the unique solution that removes linear concept predictability and maintains target covariance with minimal embedding distortion. Empirically, SPLINCE outperforms baselines on benchmarks such as Bias in Bios and Winobias, removing protected attributes while minimally damaging main-task information.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{holstege2025preserving,
  title  = {Preserving Task-Relevant Information Under Linear Concept Removal},
  author = {Floris Holstege and Shauli Ravfogel and Bram Wouters},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.10703},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10703v2},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.10703.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.10703)

Discussion