From Data to Knowledge: Evaluating How Efficiently Language Models Learn Facts

Daniel Christoph, Max Ploner, Patrick Haller, Alan Akbik
6/20/2025
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Sample efficiency is a crucial property of language models with practical implications for training efficiency. In real-world text, information follows a long-tailed distribution. Yet, we expect models to learn and recall frequent and infrequent facts. Sample-efficient models are better equipped to handle this challenge of learning and retaining rare information without requiring excessive exposure. This study analyzes multiple models of varying architectures and sizes, all trained on the same pre-training data. By annotating relational facts with their frequencies in the training corpus, we examine how model performance varies with fact frequency. Our findings show that most models perform similarly on high-frequency facts but differ notably on low-frequency facts. This analysis provides new insights into the relationship between model architecture, size, and factual learning efficiency.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{christoph2025from,
  title  = {From Data to Knowledge: Evaluating How Efficiently Language Models Learn Facts},
  author = {Daniel Christoph and Max Ploner and Patrick Haller and Alan Akbik},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.16912},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16912v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.16912.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.16912)

Discussion