Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment

Sydney Levine, Matija Franklin, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Secil Yanik Guyot, Lionel Wong +6 more
6/20/2025
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

AI systems will soon have to navigate human environments and make decisions that affect people and other AI agents whose goals and values diverge. Contractualist alignment proposes grounding those decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse under the right conditions, yet securing such agreement at scale remains costly and slow -- even for advanced AI. We therefore propose Resource-Rational Contractualism (RRC): a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form by drawing on a toolbox of normatively-grounded, cognitively-inspired heuristics that trade effort for accuracy. An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{levine2025resource,
  title  = {Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment},
  author = {Sydney Levine and Matija Franklin and Tan Zhi-Xuan and Secil Yanik Guyot and Lionel Wong and Daniel Kilov and Yejin Choi and Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Noah Goodman and Seth Lazar and Iason Gabriel},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.17434},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17434v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.17434.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.17434)

Discussion