Newtonian and Lagrangian Neural Networks: A Comparison Towards Efficient Inverse Dynamics Identification

Minh Trinh, Andreas René Geist, Josefine Monnet, Stefan Vilceanu, Sebastian Trimpe +1 more
6/22/2025
cs.ROcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Accurate inverse dynamics models are essential tools for controlling industrial robots. Recent research combines neural network regression with inverse dynamics formulations of the Newton-Euler and the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion, resulting in so-called Newtonian neural networks and Lagrangian neural networks, respectively. These physics-informed models seek to identify unknowns in the analytical equations from data. Despite their potential, current literature lacks guidance on choosing between Lagrangian and Newtonian networks. In this study, we show that when motor torques are estimated instead of directly measuring joint torques, Lagrangian networks prove less effective compared to Newtonian networks as they do not explicitly model dissipative torques. The performance of these models is compared to neural network regression on data of a MABI MAX 100 industrial robot.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{trinh2025newtonian,
  title  = {Newtonian and Lagrangian Neural Networks: A Comparison Towards Efficient Inverse Dynamics Identification},
  author = {Minh Trinh and Andreas René Geist and Josefine Monnet and Stefan Vilceanu and Sebastian Trimpe and Christian Brecher},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.17994},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17994v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.17994.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.17994)

Discussion