Breaking Barriers: Do Reinforcement Post Training Gains Transfer To Unseen Domains?

Chuxuan Hu, Yuxuan Zhu, Antony Kellermann, Caleb Biddulph, Suppakit Waiwitlikhit +2 more
6/24/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Reinforcement post training (RPT) has recently shown promise in improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, it remains unclear how well these improvements generalize to new domains, as prior work evaluates RPT models on data from the same domains used for fine-tuning. To understand the generalizability of RPT, we conduct two studies. (1) Observational: We compare a wide range of open-weight RPT models against their corresponding base models across multiple domains, including both seen and unseen domains in their fine-tuning data. (2) Interventional: we fine-tune LLMs with RPT on single domains and evaluate their performance across multiple domains. Both studies converge on the same conclusion that, although RPT brings substantial gains on tasks similar to the fine-tuning data, the gains generalize inconsistently and can vanish on domains with different reasoning patterns.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hu2025breaking,
  title  = {Breaking Barriers: Do Reinforcement Post Training Gains Transfer To Unseen Domains?},
  author = {Chuxuan Hu and Yuxuan Zhu and Antony Kellermann and Caleb Biddulph and Suppakit Waiwitlikhit and Jason Benn and Daniel Kang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.19733},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19733v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.19733.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.19733)

Discussion