Enterprise Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark

Liya Wang, David Yi, Damien Jose, John Passarelli, James Gao +2 more
6/25/2025
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) ) have demonstrated promise in boosting productivity across AI-powered tools, yet existing benchmarks like Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) inadequately assess enterprise-specific task complexities. We propose a 14-task framework grounded in Bloom's Taxonomy to holistically evaluate LLM capabilities in enterprise contexts. To address challenges of noisy data and costly annotation, we develop a scalable pipeline combining LLM-as-a-Labeler, LLM-as-a-Judge, and corrective retrieval-augmented generation (CRAG), curating a robust 9,700-sample benchmark. Evaluation of six leading models shows open-source contenders like DeepSeek R1 rival proprietary models in reasoning tasks but lag in judgment-based scenarios, likely due to overthinking. Our benchmark reveals critical enterprise performance gaps and offers actionable insights for model optimization. This work provides enterprises a blueprint for tailored evaluations and advances practical LLM deployment.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2025enterprise,
  title  = {Enterprise Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark},
  author = {Liya Wang and David Yi and Damien Jose and John Passarelli and James Gao and Jordan Leventis and Kang Li},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.20274},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20274v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.20274.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.20274)

Discussion