Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout

Apurva Shah, Axel Abels, Ann Nowé, Tom Lenaerts
6/26/2025
cs.LGcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Perpetual voting addresses fairness in sequential collective decision-making by evaluating representational equity over time. However, existing perpetual voting rules rely on full participation and complete approval information, assumptions that rarely hold in practice, where partial turnout is the norm. In this work, we study the integration of Artificial Delegates, preference-learning agents trained to represent absent voters, into perpetual voting systems. We examine how absenteeism affects fairness and representativeness under various voting methods and evaluate the extent to which Artificial Delegates can compensate for missing participation. Our findings indicate that while absenteeism significantly affects fairness, Artificial Delegates reliably mitigate these effects and enhance robustness across diverse scenarios.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{shah2025artificial,
  title  = {Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout},
  author = {Apurva Shah and Axel Abels and Ann Nowé and Tom Lenaerts},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.21186},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21186v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.21186.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.21186)

Discussion