MedEthicsQA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Benchmark for Medical Ethics Evaluation of LLMs

Jianhui Wei, Zijie Meng, Zikai Xiao, Tianxiang Hu, Yang Feng +3 more
6/28/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

Official code: JianhuiWei7/MedEthicsQA (6 stars, last commit 2025-07-02).

Abstract

While Medical Large Language Models (MedLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in clinical tasks, their ethical safety remains insufficiently explored. This paper introduces $\textbf{MedEthicsQA}$, a comprehensive benchmark comprising $\textbf{5,623}$ multiple-choice questions and $\textbf{5,351}$ open-ended questions for evaluation of medical ethics in LLMs. We systematically establish a hierarchical taxonomy integrating global medical ethical standards. The benchmark encompasses widely used medical datasets, authoritative question banks, and scenarios derived from PubMed literature. Rigorous quality control involving multi-stage filtering and multi-faceted expert validation ensures the reliability of the dataset with a low error rate ($2.72\%$). Evaluation of state-of-the-art MedLLMs exhibit declined performance in answering medical ethics questions compared to their foundation counterparts, elucidating the deficiencies of medical ethics alignment. The dataset, registered under CC BY-NC 4.0 license, is available at https://github.com/JianhuiWei7/MedEthicsQA.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

60PythonFeb 14, 20251 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wei2025medethicsqa,
  title  = {MedEthicsQA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Benchmark for Medical Ethics Evaluation of LLMs},
  author = {Jianhui Wei and Zijie Meng and Zikai Xiao and Tianxiang Hu and Yang Feng and Zhijie Zhou and Jian Wu and Zuozhu Liu},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.22808},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22808v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.22808.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.22808)

Discussion