The Age of Sensorial Zero Trust: Why We Can No Longer Trust Our Senses

Fabio Correa Xavier
7/1/2025
cs.CRcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In a world where deepfakes and cloned voices are emerging as sophisticated attack vectors, organizations require a new security mindset: Sensorial Zero Trust [9]. This article presents a scientific analysis of the need to systematically doubt information perceived through the senses, establishing rigorous verification protocols to mitigate the risks of fraud based on generative artificial intelligence. Key concepts, such as Out-of-Band verification, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as forensic collaborators, cryptographic provenance, and human training, are integrated into a framework that extends Zero Trust principles to human sensory information. The approach is grounded in empirical findings and academic research, emphasizing that in an era of AI-generated realities, even our eyes and ears can no longer be implicitly trusted without verification. Leaders are called to foster a culture of methodological skepticism to protect organizational integrity in this new threat landscape.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{xavier2025sensorial,
  title  = {The Age of Sensorial Zero Trust: Why We Can No Longer Trust Our Senses},
  author = {Fabio Correa Xavier},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.00907},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00907v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.00907.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.00907)

Discussion