The Emotional Alignment Design Policy

Eric Schwitzgebel, Jeff Sebo
7/7/2025
cs.CYcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

According to what we call the Emotional Alignment Design Policy, artificial entities should be designed to elicit emotional reactions from users that appropriately reflect the entities' capacities and moral status, or lack thereof. This principle can be violated in two ways: by designing an artificial system that elicits stronger or weaker emotional reactions than its capacities and moral status warrant (overshooting or undershooting), or by designing a system that elicits the wrong type of emotional reaction (hitting the wrong target). Although presumably attractive, practical implementation faces several challenges including: How can we respect user autonomy while promoting appropriate responses? How should we navigate expert and public disagreement and uncertainty about facts and values? What if emotional alignment seems to require creating or destroying entities with moral status? To what extent should designs conform to versus attempt to alter user assumptions and attitudes?

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{schwitzgebel2025emotional,
  title  = {The Emotional Alignment Design Policy},
  author = {Eric Schwitzgebel and Jeff Sebo},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.06263},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06263v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.06263.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.06263)

Discussion