Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?

Yanjian Zhang, Guillaume Wisniewski, Nadi Tomeh, Thierry Charnois
7/15/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Human reasoning involves different strategies, each suited to specific problems. Prior work shows that large language model (LLMs) tend to favor a single reasoning strategy, potentially limiting their effectiveness in diverse reasoning challenges. In this work, we investigate whether prompting can control LLMs reasoning strategies and assess its impact on logical problem-solving. While our experiments show that no single strategy consistently improves accuracy, performance could be enhanced if models could adaptively choose the optimal strategy. We propose methods to guide LLMs in strategy selection, highlighting new ways to refine their reasoning abilities.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2025reasoning,
  title  = {Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?},
  author = {Yanjian Zhang and Guillaume Wisniewski and Nadi Tomeh and Thierry Charnois},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.11423},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11423v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.11423.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.11423)

Discussion