Multilingual LLMs Are Not Multilingual Thinkers: Evidence from Hindi Analogy Evaluation

Ashray Gupta, Rohan Joseph, Sunny Rai
7/17/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Analogies test a model's ability to infer implicit relationships between concepts, making them a key benchmark for evaluating reasoning capabilities. While large language models (LLMs) are widely evaluated for reasoning in English, their abilities in Indic languages remain understudied, limiting our understanding of whether these models generalize across languages. To address this gap, we introduce a new Hindi Analogy Test Set (HATS), comprising 405 multiple-choice questions sourced from Indian government exams. We benchmark state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs using various prompting strategies and introduce a grounded Chain of Thought approach that leverages cognitive theories of analogical reasoning. This approach improves model performance on Hindi analogy questions. Our experiments show that models perform best with English prompts, irrespective of the prompting strategy. Our test set addresses the lack of a critical resource to evaluate LLM reasoning capabilities in Hindi.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gupta2025multilingual,
  title  = {Multilingual LLMs Are Not Multilingual Thinkers: Evidence from Hindi Analogy Evaluation},
  author = {Ashray Gupta and Rohan Joseph and Sunny Rai},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.13238},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13238v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.13238.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.13238)

Discussion